← Back to home
Comparison · HR

Jorani vs Miter

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Jorani and Miter — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Jorani vs Miter: at a glance

FeatureJoraniMiter
SectorHRHR
Velocity score0.03.8
Sparks · 30d01
Top themeshr, leave-management, self-hosted, phpconstruction-tech, payroll, accounts-payable, field-operations
Last editorial update19d ago1d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Jorani?

A dormant leave-management app returns with an MIT relicense and a hard break from its own API

Jorani is a self-hosted leave and overtime management app built on legacy CodeIgniter PHP. After a three-year gap, v1.0.4 arrives labelled a maintenance release but is anything but conservative: it relicenses from AGPL to MIT, moves the repository to a new organization, and deletes the Basic Auth REST API, the client-side password encryption layer and MySQL 5.7 support. The database schema is untouched, so the disruption is entirely in licensing, packaging and interfaces rather than data.

Read the full Jorani trajectory →

What is Miter?

Miter added accounts payable and opened a free API — it's no longer just construction payroll.

Miter ships one large digest every one to two months rather than continuous entries, and each is organized by module: HR, Payroll, Field Ops, Spend, Platform, Ecosystem. The summer update is the broadest yet, adding an Accounts Payable module, API 2.0 as a free self-serve install, Safety Passport credential verification, entity-scoped granular permissions, and a run of payroll and compliance work including California break rules and OSHA report generation.

Read the full Miter trajectory →

Jorani vs Miter: editorial side-by-side

J0.0

A dormant leave-management app returns with an MIT relicense and a hard break from its own API

◆ Current state

Jorani is a self-hosted leave and overtime management app built on legacy CodeIgniter PHP. After a three-year gap, v1.0.4 arrives labelled a maintenance release but is anything but conservative: it relicenses from AGPL to MIT, moves the repository to a new organization, and deletes the Basic Auth REST API, the client-side password encryption layer and MySQL 5.7 support. The database schema is untouched, so the disruption is entirely in licensing, packaging and interfaces rather than data.

◆ Where it's heading

The long arc is a small project shedding weight. Releases through 2017 filled in the workflow model — cancellation states, SSO, mandatory rejection comments, a steady stream of translations. Version 1.0.0 in 2020 rebuilt the leave-balance engine and documented an OpenAPI surface, and the two releases since have been almost entirely security and PHP-version compatibility. v1.0.4 continues by removing rather than adding, including the very API 1.0.0 had documented, and folds the old tree under a legacy/ directory — which reads as groundwork for a replacement rather than a destination.

◆ Prediction

The legacy/ layout and the withdrawn REST API point to a new API and a non-legacy codebase as the next move; the entries don't indicate on what stack, or when.

M3.8

Miter added accounts payable and opened a free API — it's no longer just construction payroll.

◆ Current state

Miter ships one large digest every one to two months rather than continuous entries, and each is organized by module: HR, Payroll, Field Ops, Spend, Platform, Ecosystem. The summer update is the broadest yet, adding an Accounts Payable module, API 2.0 as a free self-serve install, Safety Passport credential verification, entity-scoped granular permissions, and a run of payroll and compliance work including California break rules and OSHA report generation.

◆ Where it's heading

The module list keeps growing outward from payroll into everything a contractor's back office touches, and the last two releases added the two things a platform needs that a payroll product does not: a spend module of its own and an open, unmetered API. Vote counts published against each feature show the roadmap is being run off customer demand, and the compliance work is concentrated where construction is most exposed — break rules, OSHA, prevailing rate calculations.

◆ Prediction

Expect the Spend module to keep filling out around Accounts Payable, and third-party integrations built on API 2.0 to start appearing in the Ecosystem section of the next digest.

Alternatives to Jorani and Miter

Other HR products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Jorani or Miter.

See all Jorani alternatives → · See all Miter alternatives →

Recent activity from Jorani and Miter

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agoMiterAccounts Payable module and a free self-serve API 2.0
  2. 2mo agoMiterMiter launches Performance 2.0 review module for construction
  3. 3mo agoMiterPayroll adds negative deductions for correcting over-deductions
  4. 3mo agoMiterConsolidated grid daily reports for field supervisors
  5. 4mo agoJoraniSecurity and PHP8.5 support
  6. 7mo agoMiterAutomated PTO payouts for offboarding
  7. 7mo agoMiterOffboarding checklists for admins and departing staff
  8. 3y agoJoraniSecurity and PHP8.2 compat release (No DB Patch)
  9. 5y agoJoraniJorani 1.0 revamps leave balances and documents a Swagger API
  10. 8y agoJoraniJorani 0.6.5 adds Portuguese and Arabic translations
  11. 9y agoJoraniJorani 0.6.4 fixes leave transitions and broken ICS feeds
  12. 9y agoJoraniJorani 0.6.3 adds Greek and mandatory rejection comments

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Jorani and Miter?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Miter is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Jorani better than Miter?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Miter is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other HR products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Jorani?

Top Jorani alternatives in HR are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Jorani alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/jorani for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Miter?

Top Miter alternatives in HR are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Miter alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/miter for the full list with editorial commentary on each.