← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

Knock vs profoc

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Knock and profoc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Knock vs profoc: at a glance

FeatureKnockprofoc
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score6.30.0
Sparks · 30d10
Top themesnotifications, developer-infrastructure, rbac, workflow-automationforecasting, online-learning, r-package, rcpp
Last editorial update12h ago19h ago
WebsiteVisit →

What is Knock?

Knock is hardening for enterprise buyers while its agent takes over the analysis work.

Knock ships weekly, in small, legible increments across three lanes: account governance (custom roles, passkeys), workflow primitives (wait-for-event, branch rebasing), and data ingress (Amplitude, Clay). The newest entry adds granular custom roles, which closes the last obvious gap in account-level access control. Alongside that, the in-product agent gained analytics, letting teams interrogate delivery performance without building reports.

Read the full Knock trajectory →

What is profoc?

A forecast combination package that spun its profiler out into its own project

profoc combines probabilistic forecasts online, using the Bernstein online aggregation family with B-spline smoothing over quantiles and time. The recent releases are infrastructure rather than method: 1.3.4 removed a using namespace arma directive for CRAN compliance and closed a timer edge case, 1.3.3 adjusted the integration with rcpptimer against its now-stable 1.2.0 API. The last release to change what users can do was 1.3.0, which exposed the conline C++ class to R and exported init_experts_list(), make_basis_mats(), make_hat_mats() and post_process_model() so the engine can be driven directly.

Read the full profoc trajectory →

Knock vs profoc: editorial side-by-side

K
Knock
INFRA · APIS
6.3

Knock is hardening for enterprise buyers while its agent takes over the analysis work.

◆ Current state

Knock ships weekly, in small, legible increments across three lanes: account governance (custom roles, passkeys), workflow primitives (wait-for-event, branch rebasing), and data ingress (Amplitude, Clay). The newest entry adds granular custom roles, which closes the last obvious gap in account-level access control. Alongside that, the in-product agent gained analytics, letting teams interrogate delivery performance without building reports.

◆ Where it's heading

Two arcs run in parallel. The infrastructure lane is buying enterprise credibility — roles, passkeys, audit-grade permissions — the checklist items that decide procurement rather than daily use. The data lane keeps widening what can trigger a workflow: product analytics from Amplitude, enriched rows from Clay, internal Slack channels as a destination. Together they push Knock from a notification API toward the messaging control plane, with the agent as the layer that explains what the plane did.

◆ Prediction

Expect the roles work to continue into audit logs or scoped API keys, since granular permissions without an activity trail is an incomplete enterprise story. More data sources are likely on the same cadence, with the CRM and warehouse categories the obvious remaining gaps.

P
profoc
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A forecast combination package that spun its profiler out into its own project

◆ Current state

profoc combines probabilistic forecasts online, using the Bernstein online aggregation family with B-spline smoothing over quantiles and time. The recent releases are infrastructure rather than method: 1.3.4 removed a using namespace arma directive for CRAN compliance and closed a timer edge case, 1.3.3 adjusted the integration with rcpptimer against its now-stable 1.2.0 API. The last release to change what users can do was 1.3.0, which exposed the conline C++ class to R and exported init_experts_list(), make_basis_mats(), make_hat_mats() and post_process_model() so the engine can be driven directly.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is toward a reusable C++ core with thin language bindings. The timing code that lived inside profoc was extracted into the standalone rcpptimer package in 1.3.2, deliberately so other R packages and Python projects could use it through cpptimer and cppytimer, and the clock header was reworked in 1.3.1 to maximise the code shared between the R and Python versions. Method work sits earlier in the history - periodic splines and penalties in 1.2.0, the penalty() function in 1.1.0 - while the recent cadence, a single release in the last sixteen months, points at a package the maintainer considers finished.

◆ Prediction

The repeated references to future Python use suggest the next significant work happens outside this package, in the shared C++ components, rather than in profoc's R surface.

Alternatives to Knock and profoc

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Knock or profoc.

See all Knock alternatives → · See all profoc alternatives →

Recent activity from Knock and profoc

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agoKnockCustom roles and permissions
  2. 6d agoKnockPower internal Slack alerts
  3. 7d agoKnockCategory + tag management
  4. 13d agoKnockAmplitude data source
  5. 20d agoKnockAnalytics in the Knock agent
  6. 21d agoKnockWait for event function
  7. 6mo agoprofocCRAN compliance fix removing a namespace directive
  8. 1y agoprofocTimer integration updated to the stable rcpptimer API
  9. 2y agoprofocTiming code extracted into the standalone rcpptimer package
  10. 2y agoprofocInteger overflow fix and Welford timing statistics
  11. 2y agoprofocThe conline C++ class opens up to R users
  12. 2y agoprofocQuantile crossing flagged and tidy methods added

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Knock and profoc?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Knock is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Knock better than profoc?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Knock is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Knock?

Top Knock alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Knock alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/knock for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to profoc?

Top profoc alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "profoc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/profoc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.