← Back to home
Comparison · DevOps

Manticore Search vs Rivet

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Manticore Search and Rivet — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Manticore Search vs Rivet: at a glance

FeatureManticore SearchRivet
SectorDevOpsDevOps
Velocity score5.07.5
Sparks · 30d02
Top themessearch-engine, open-source, sql, performanceactors, serverless, storage engine, s3
Last editorial update2d ago3d ago
WebsiteVisit →—

What is Manticore Search?

Manticore 31.0.7 undoes a 2x COUNT(DISTINCT) slowdown its own collation fix caused.

Manticore Search's 31.x tags so far are fixes rather than features. 31.0.3 and 31.0.4 were CI and packaging work; 31.0.7 restores string COUNT(DISTINCT) speed after the 29.18.5 collation fix made it 2x slower (1.1 s to 2.4 s on the logs10m benchmark) by calling tolower() per byte. A lookup table replaces the call without changing hash values, so secondary indexes and histograms stay compatible.

Read the full Manticore Search trajectory →

What is Rivet?

Rivet 3.0 Preview runs as one stateless binary on WarpDrive, with S3 as its only dependency.

Rivet has spent two months building infrastructure for long-lived actors and AI agents: BYOC in customer clouds, OpenTelemetry tracing, actor-scoped JWTs, Pi agent runtimes and agentOS Hosted VMs. On October 5 it said 3.0 would replace NATS with S3. The October 26 3.0 Preview delivers that: a new storage engine, WarpDrive, promises bottomless storage on S3 at SSD speed, and Rivet becomes a single stateless binary.

Read the full Rivet trajectory →

Manticore Search vs Rivet: editorial side-by-side

M5.0

Manticore 31.0.7 undoes a 2x COUNT(DISTINCT) slowdown its own collation fix caused.

◆ Current state

Manticore Search's 31.x tags so far are fixes rather than features. 31.0.3 and 31.0.4 were CI and packaging work; 31.0.7 restores string COUNT(DISTINCT) speed after the 29.18.5 collation fix made it 2x slower (1.1 s to 2.4 s on the logs10m benchmark) by calling tolower() per byte. A lookup table replaces the call without changing hash values, so secondary indexes and histograms stay compatible.

◆ Where it's heading

October has been correctness work on string handling (range filters, collation-aware COUNT(DISTINCT)) followed by fixing the performance cost of those fixes. The 31.x line still appears in the feed without notes on what features justified the major version.

◆ Prediction

Expect more 31.0.x patches in this vein. What new capability defines 31.x remains unclear from these entries.

R
Rivet
DEVOPS
7.5

Rivet 3.0 Preview runs as one stateless binary on WarpDrive, with S3 as its only dependency.

◆ Current state

Rivet has spent two months building infrastructure for long-lived actors and AI agents: BYOC in customer clouds, OpenTelemetry tracing, actor-scoped JWTs, Pi agent runtimes and agentOS Hosted VMs. On October 5 it said 3.0 would replace NATS with S3. The October 26 3.0 Preview delivers that: a new storage engine, WarpDrive, promises bottomless storage on S3 at SSD speed, and Rivet becomes a single stateless binary.

◆ Where it's heading

Each release removes operational burden: BYOC moved the control plane into the customer's cloud, and 3.0 reduces the self-hosted footprint to one binary plus an S3 bucket. The agent work (Pi, agentOS) sits on top as the main workload Rivet is courting.

◆ Prediction

Expect benchmarks and migration guidance for 2.x users during the preview, followed by a 3.0 GA. The entry gives no performance numbers, so the SSD-speed claim is unverified.

Alternatives to Manticore Search and Rivet

Other DevOps products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Manticore Search or Rivet.

See all Manticore Search alternatives → · See all Rivet alternatives →

Recent activity from Manticore Search and Rivet

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2d agoManticore Search31.0.7: string COUNT(DISTINCT) 2x slowdown fixed
  2. 3d agoRivetIntroducing Rivet 3.0 Preview ⚡
  3. 5d agoManticore Search31.0.4: CI fix for bundled Debian dependencies
  4. 5d agoManticore Search31.0.3: Test Kit pinned to Executor 1.4.6
  5. 8d agoManticore Search29.18.7: Manticore Buddy sidecar bumped to 4.4.8
  6. 9d agoManticore Search29.18.6: crash dumps now name the operation and table
  7. 9d agoManticore SearchFix: COUNT(DISTINCT) on strings now respects session collation
  8. 17d agoRivetIntroducing agentOS 0.4 & Hosted VMs
  9. 22d agoRivetIntroducing Pi Durable for Rivet
  10. 24d agoRivetReplacing Our Message Broker with... S3? ⚡
  11. 28d agoRivetIntroducing Pi 1.0 for Rivet
  12. 1mo agoRivetIntroducing JWT Authentication for Rivet Actors

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Manticore Search and Rivet?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Rivet is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 5.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Manticore Search better than Rivet?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Rivet is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 5.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other DevOps products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Manticore Search?

Top Manticore Search alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Manticore Search alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/manticoresearch for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Rivet?

Top Rivet alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Rivet alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rivet for the full list with editorial commentary on each.