← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

mpactr vs surveytidy

A side-by-side editorial comparison of mpactr and surveytidy — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-packages

mpactr vs surveytidy: at a glance

Featurempactrsurveytidy
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmetabolomics, mass-spectrometry, peak-filtering, data-importsurvey-statistics, tidyverse, dplyr-verbs, metadata-tracking
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is mpactr?

mpactr spent two spring releases normalizing case in metadata after users kept tripping on it.

mpactr filters mass-spectrometry peak tables — removing contaminants, ion duplicates and low-reproducibility features before downstream metabolomics analysis — with a data.table and Rcpp core. Development is slow and the recent releases are small. The May pair both address the same friction: column names and imported table names arriving in inconsistent case and failing to match.

Read the full mpactr trajectory →

What is surveytidy?

surveytidy taught every dplyr verb to operate on a whole collection of surveys at once.

surveytidy is the tidyverse-facing half of a two-package survey stack, wrapping survey design objects from surveycore so filter, mutate, select and the rest work on them while carrying variable labels, value labels and a transformation log alongside the data. The May release extended that verb surface to survey_collection, the abstraction surveycore uses to hold several surveys as one object, so a pipeline written once dispatches across every member.

Read the full surveytidy trajectory →

mpactr vs surveytidy: editorial side-by-side

M
mpactr
INFRA · APIS
0.0

mpactr spent two spring releases normalizing case in metadata after users kept tripping on it.

◆ Current state

mpactr filters mass-spectrometry peak tables — removing contaminants, ion duplicates and low-reproducibility features before downstream metabolomics analysis — with a data.table and Rcpp core. Development is slow and the recent releases are small. The May pair both address the same friction: column names and imported table names arriving in inconsistent case and failing to match.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is stabilizing its input contract rather than growing its filtering methods. Metadata column names are now forced lowercase inside import_data() regardless of how the file was written, imported peak_tables names not present in the injection column are lowercased too, and get_meta_data() was renamed to get_metadata() in the same pass. Before that the work was infrastructural — Rcpp introduced to speed up filtering, data.table moved from Depends to Imports, and memory errors cleared so the package passes Valgrind and both sanitizers. Note the earliest entry compares against a v1.0.0 tag that precedes 0.1.0 in the repository, so version ordering in this feed is not reliable.

◆ Prediction

The case-normalization work has now touched both metadata columns and peak table names across two consecutive releases, which suggests the input-matching problem is not fully closed and a third pass is plausible. Nothing in these entries points to new filtering methods.

S
surveytidy
INFRA · APIS
0.0

surveytidy taught every dplyr verb to operate on a whole collection of surveys at once.

◆ Current state

surveytidy is the tidyverse-facing half of a two-package survey stack, wrapping survey design objects from surveycore so filter, mutate, select and the rest work on them while carrying variable labels, value labels and a transformation log alongside the data. The May release extended that verb surface to survey_collection, the abstraction surveycore uses to hold several surveys as one object, so a pipeline written once dispatches across every member.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is being built in two layers that arrive in order: vector-level transformations first, structural dispatch second. The make_* family in 0.4.0 handles the recoding that survey work actually consists of — labelled to factor, multi-level to dichotomous, scale reversal, valence flipping — with value labels propagating automatically. Collection support then applies data-masking, tidyselect, grouping, slicing and collapsing verbs per survey, with joins explicitly refused and a typed message reporting which surveys were skipped. Metadata fidelity is the recurring bug source: labels surviving across(), stale labels left behind by recoding, the transformation log keeping up with what the verbs did.

◆ Prediction

Joins are the one verb family that errors on collections, with users directed to join before constructing the collection, so that restriction is the clearest outstanding gap. The re-export of surveycore's collection constructors suggests the package is positioning itself as the single import users need, which points toward more re-exports as surveycore's stable API settles.

Alternatives to mpactr and surveytidy

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either mpactr or surveytidy.

See all mpactr alternatives → · See all surveytidy alternatives →

Recent activity from mpactr and surveytidy

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agosurveytidymutate() syncs metadata for across() recodes
  2. 3mo agompactrPeak table names lowercased when absent from the injection column
  3. 3mo agompactrMetadata column names forced lowercase; get_metadata() renamed
  4. 3mo agosurveytidydplyr and tidyr verbs dispatch across survey collections
  5. 5mo agosurveytidyFive label-aware recoding functions for use inside mutate()
  6. 10mo agompactrValgrind and sanitizer memory issues cleared
  7. 1y agompactrRcpp added to speed up filtering; data.table moved to Imports
  8. 1y agompactrmpactr 0.1.0

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between mpactr and surveytidy?

Both compete on the same themes — r-packages — within Infra & APIs. mpactr and surveytidy are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is mpactr better than surveytidy?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. mpactr and surveytidy are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to mpactr?

Top mpactr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mpactr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mpactr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to surveytidy?

Top surveytidy alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "surveytidy alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/surveytidy for the full list with editorial commentary on each.