← Back to home
Comparison · Marketing

Neos CMS vs Open Web Analytics

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Neos CMS and Open Web Analytics — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Neos CMS vs Open Web Analytics: at a glance

FeatureNeos CMSOpen Web Analytics
SectorMarketingMarketing
Velocity score5.07.5
Sparks · 30d02
Top themescontent management, content repository, workspace roles, dual branch releasesweb-analytics, self-hosted, table-partitioning, job-scheduler
Last editorial update11d ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Neos CMS?

Neos is finishing the 9.x content-repository rebuild while 9.2 adds editorial roles.

Maintenance releases go out to two branches at once, with 9.1.7 and 9.0.14 carrying an identical set of fixes minutes apart. The substance sits in the 9.2 beta line: a workspace module with role assignments, a grace period for soft-removal garbage collection, a backend document node link in the workspace breadcrumb, and a bump of the minimum PHP version to 8.4. The recurring bug fixes cluster around the content repository, dimension space points, projections, and publishing selected changes.

Read the full Neos CMS trajectory →

What is Open Web Analytics?

After a fortnight of repairs, OWA finally ships features again: partitioning and a scheduler.

OWA published more releases in the last month than in the previous two years, and 1.11.0 is the first of them that adds rather than repairs. It brings two new subsystems that depend on each other: date partitioning for the fact tables, and a job scheduler driven by a single cron entry. Behind it sits the repair sequence — security hardening in 1.8.2 and 1.8.3, a PHP 8.2 floor and rebuilt JavaScript toolchain in 1.9.0, an emergency 403 fix in 1.9.1, the PSR-4 migration and a repaired updater in 1.10.0, and tightened REST responses in 1.10.1.

Read the full Open Web Analytics trajectory →

Neos CMS vs Open Web Analytics: editorial side-by-side

N
Neos CMS
MARKETING
5.0

Neos is finishing the 9.x content-repository rebuild while 9.2 adds editorial roles.

◆ Current state

Maintenance releases go out to two branches at once, with 9.1.7 and 9.0.14 carrying an identical set of fixes minutes apart. The substance sits in the 9.2 beta line: a workspace module with role assignments, a grace period for soft-removal garbage collection, a backend document node link in the workspace breadcrumb, and a bump of the minimum PHP version to 8.4. The recurring bug fixes cluster around the content repository, dimension space points, projections, and publishing selected changes.

◆ Where it's heading

The 9.x line is still settling the event-sourced content repository introduced with it, judging by how many fixes touch projections, tag inheritance across dimensions, and partial publishing. On top of that, 9.2 is adding editorial governance, with workspaces gaining explicit role assignments rather than implicit access. The PHP 8.4 requirement signals the project is willing to move its floor rather than carry compatibility.

◆ Prediction

The 9.2 betas keep adding to workspaces, roles first and now garbage-collection controls; expect the release to land with workspace administration as its headline rather than any change to the editing interface.

O7.5

After a fortnight of repairs, OWA finally ships features again: partitioning and a scheduler.

◆ Current state

OWA published more releases in the last month than in the previous two years, and 1.11.0 is the first of them that adds rather than repairs. It brings two new subsystems that depend on each other: date partitioning for the fact tables, and a job scheduler driven by a single cron entry. Behind it sits the repair sequence — security hardening in 1.8.2 and 1.8.3, a PHP 8.2 floor and rebuilt JavaScript toolchain in 1.9.0, an emergency 403 fix in 1.9.1, the PSR-4 migration and a repaired updater in 1.10.0, and tightened REST responses in 1.10.1.

◆ Where it's heading

The project has moved from making itself installable to making itself operable at volume. The upgrade design says the maintainers know who they are dealing with: the schema update is mandatory and the scheduler refuses every job until it runs, but partitioning an existing install is deliberately left as a manual, dry-runnable step with a published cost of roughly five seconds per million rows per table, because it rewrites each fact table twice under a write lock. The new cron requirement is the first time OWA has asked operators to run something periodic, and the admin nag until it exists suggests they expect people to miss it.

◆ Prediction

With partitioning in place but opt-in, expect the follow-up work to be retention and pruning on top of the partitions — the reason to partition fact tables is to drop old ones cheaply, and the scheduler is the piece that would do it. The 2.0 deprecation list flagged in 1.10.0 remains the other open thread.

Alternatives to Neos CMS and Open Web Analytics

Other Marketing products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Neos CMS or Open Web Analytics.

See all Neos CMS alternatives → · See all Open Web Analytics alternatives →

Recent activity from Neos CMS and Open Web Analytics

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 15h agoOpen Web AnalyticsDate partitioning and a job scheduler land in OWA 1.11.0
  2. 14d agoOpen Web AnalyticsREST responses narrowed to documented properties
  3. 17d agoOpen Web AnalyticsPSR-4 migration completed and the updater repaired
  4. 20d agoOpen Web AnalyticsEmergency fix for the 403 blocking every fresh install
  5. 22d agoOpen Web AnalyticsPHP 8.2 floor, rebuilt JS toolchain, and a test suite
  6. 26d agoOpen Web AnalyticsREST authentication fixed on the siteusers endpoint
  7. 1mo agoNeos CMS9.0.14: maintenance backport of the 9.1.7 fixes
  8. 1mo agoNeos CMS9.1.7: dimension tag inheritance and partial publishing fixes
  9. 1mo agoNeos CMS9.2.0-beta2: no release notes in the feed
  10. 1mo agoNeos CMS9.2.0-beta1: workspace roles and a PHP 8.4 floor

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Neos CMS and Open Web Analytics?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Open Web Analytics is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 5.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Neos CMS better than Open Web Analytics?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Open Web Analytics is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 5.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Marketing products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Neos CMS?

Top Neos CMS alternatives in Marketing are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Neos CMS alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/neos-cms for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Open Web Analytics?

Top Open Web Analytics alternatives in Marketing are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Open Web Analytics alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/open-web-analytics for the full list with editorial commentary on each.