← Back to home
Comparison · DevOps

osm2pgsql vs Rivet

A side-by-side editorial comparison of osm2pgsql and Rivet — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

osm2pgsql vs Rivet: at a glance

Featureosm2pgsqlRivet
SectorDevOpsDevOps
Velocity score0.07.5
Sparks · 30d02
Top themesopenstreetmap, postgis, tile-expiry, lua-scriptingactors, serverless, storage engine, s3
Last editorial update2mo ago3d ago
WebsiteVisit →—

What is osm2pgsql?

osm2pgsql is rebuilding tile expiry so a small edit stops invalidating a whole lake.

osm2pgsql ships two or three releases a year and the last two carry substantial new machinery. 2.3.0 reworked tile expiry: polygons are now expired by shape rather than bounding box, and an opt-in diff expire mode computes the symmetric difference between an object's old and new geometry so a small edit to a large feature only invalidates the tiles it actually touched. It also added configurable limits on how many tiles one geometry or one run can expire. Before that, 2.2.0 introduced Locators for fast region lookup during import and process_deleted_* callbacks for handling removed objects in Lua.

Read the full osm2pgsql trajectory →

What is Rivet?

Rivet 3.0 Preview runs as one stateless binary on WarpDrive, with S3 as its only dependency.

Rivet has spent two months building infrastructure for long-lived actors and AI agents: BYOC in customer clouds, OpenTelemetry tracing, actor-scoped JWTs, Pi agent runtimes and agentOS Hosted VMs. On October 5 it said 3.0 would replace NATS with S3. The October 26 3.0 Preview delivers that: a new storage engine, WarpDrive, promises bottomless storage on S3 at SSD speed, and Rivet becomes a single stateless binary.

Read the full Rivet trajectory →

osm2pgsql vs Rivet: editorial side-by-side

O
osm2pgsql
DEVOPS
0.0

osm2pgsql is rebuilding tile expiry so a small edit stops invalidating a whole lake.

◆ Current state

osm2pgsql ships two or three releases a year and the last two carry substantial new machinery. 2.3.0 reworked tile expiry: polygons are now expired by shape rather than bounding box, and an opt-in diff expire mode computes the symmetric difference between an object's old and new geometry so a small edit to a large feature only invalidates the tiles it actually touched. It also added configurable limits on how many tiles one geometry or one run can expire. Before that, 2.2.0 introduced Locators for fast region lookup during import and process_deleted_* callbacks for handling removed objects in Lua.

◆ Where it's heading

The project is adding primitives rather than features, and saying so explicitly — 2.2.0 describes Locators and deleted callbacks as building blocks for things users have requested for years. The pattern is to move work that previously happened in the database after import into the import pipeline itself: region tagging via Locators instead of a post-import spatial join, deletion handling via callbacks instead of database triggers. The expiry work follows the same logic, pushing precision upstream so downstream re-rendering does less. The new expiry limits are a defensive addition, added specifically because vandalism or misconfiguration can otherwise generate billions of tiles and exhaust memory.

◆ Prediction

Expect diff expire to move from opt-in toward default once it has been exercised, following the pattern of the middle table format that became default in 1.11.0. The experimental osm2pgsql-expire command introduced in 2.2.0 is the other loose thread — it is explicitly marked as subject to change and has not stabilised.

R
Rivet
DEVOPS
7.5

Rivet 3.0 Preview runs as one stateless binary on WarpDrive, with S3 as its only dependency.

◆ Current state

Rivet has spent two months building infrastructure for long-lived actors and AI agents: BYOC in customer clouds, OpenTelemetry tracing, actor-scoped JWTs, Pi agent runtimes and agentOS Hosted VMs. On October 5 it said 3.0 would replace NATS with S3. The October 26 3.0 Preview delivers that: a new storage engine, WarpDrive, promises bottomless storage on S3 at SSD speed, and Rivet becomes a single stateless binary.

◆ Where it's heading

Each release removes operational burden: BYOC moved the control plane into the customer's cloud, and 3.0 reduces the self-hosted footprint to one binary plus an S3 bucket. The agent work (Pi, agentOS) sits on top as the main workload Rivet is courting.

◆ Prediction

Expect benchmarks and migration guidance for 2.x users during the preview, followed by a 3.0 GA. The entry gives no performance numbers, so the SSD-speed claim is unverified.

Alternatives to osm2pgsql and Rivet

Other DevOps products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either osm2pgsql or Rivet.

See all osm2pgsql alternatives → · See all Rivet alternatives →

Recent activity from osm2pgsql and Rivet

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3d agoRivetIntroducing Rivet 3.0 Preview ⚡
  2. 17d agoRivetIntroducing agentOS 0.4 & Hosted VMs
  3. 22d agoRivetIntroducing Pi Durable for Rivet
  4. 24d agoRivetReplacing Our Message Broker with... S3? ⚡
  5. 28d agoRivetIntroducing Pi 1.0 for Rivet
  6. 1mo agoRivetIntroducing JWT Authentication for Rivet Actors
  7. 3mo agoosm2pgsql2.3.1 fixes a diff-expire segfault with multiple expire outputs
  8. 4mo agoosm2pgsqlDiff expire invalidates only the tiles a change actually touched ⚡
  9. 1y agoosm2pgsqlLocators and deleted-object callbacks land as new primitives ⚡
  10. 1y agoosm2pgsql2.1.1 refuses to update when the flatnode file is missing
  11. 1y agoosm2pgsql2.1.0 makes prepared statements work with connection poolers
  12. 1y agoosm2pgsql2.0.1 fixes schema forwarding and missing binary installation

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between osm2pgsql and Rivet?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Rivet is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 0.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is osm2pgsql better than Rivet?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Rivet is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 0.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other DevOps products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to osm2pgsql?

Top osm2pgsql alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "osm2pgsql alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/osm2pgsql for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Rivet?

Top Rivet alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Rivet alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rivet for the full list with editorial commentary on each.