← Back to home
Comparison · DevOps

Rivet vs Stirling-PDF

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Rivet and Stirling-PDF — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:self-hosted

Rivet vs Stirling-PDF: at a glance

FeatureRivetStirling-PDF
SectorDevOpsDevOps
Velocity score7.55.0
Sparks · 30d20
Top themesactors, serverless, storage engine, s3pdf-tools, self-hosted, desktop-app, digital-signatures
Last editorial update3d ago2mo ago
Website—Visit →

What is Rivet?

Rivet 3.0 Preview runs as one stateless binary on WarpDrive, with S3 as its only dependency.

Rivet has spent two months building infrastructure for long-lived actors and AI agents: BYOC in customer clouds, OpenTelemetry tracing, actor-scoped JWTs, Pi agent runtimes and agentOS Hosted VMs. On October 5 it said 3.0 would replace NATS with S3. The October 26 3.0 Preview delivers that: a new storage engine, WarpDrive, promises bottomless storage on S3 at SSD speed, and Rivet becomes a single stateless binary.

Read the full Rivet trajectory →

What is Stirling-PDF?

Stirling PDF is clearing the decks — six weeks of hotfixes ahead of a promised big release.

Every release in this window is corrective. 2.14.3 fixes tool operations failing on Debian 12 and Fedora 44, concurrency problems on merge, an automation bug in image removal, and crashes on 2GB PDFs, plus Linux startup and a Windows ARM64 test build. Before it, 2.14.2 patched Postgres user-data loading, 2.14.1 stopped PostHog loading before opt flags were read and fixed certificate signing, and 2.13.2 covered security fixes and desktop performance. The one feature release is 2.14.0, which added hardware token signing via PKCS#11 smart cards and OS certificate stores on desktop.

Read the full Stirling-PDF trajectory →

Rivet vs Stirling-PDF: editorial side-by-side

R
Rivet
DEVOPS
7.5

Rivet 3.0 Preview runs as one stateless binary on WarpDrive, with S3 as its only dependency.

◆ Current state

Rivet has spent two months building infrastructure for long-lived actors and AI agents: BYOC in customer clouds, OpenTelemetry tracing, actor-scoped JWTs, Pi agent runtimes and agentOS Hosted VMs. On October 5 it said 3.0 would replace NATS with S3. The October 26 3.0 Preview delivers that: a new storage engine, WarpDrive, promises bottomless storage on S3 at SSD speed, and Rivet becomes a single stateless binary.

◆ Where it's heading

Each release removes operational burden: BYOC moved the control plane into the customer's cloud, and 3.0 reduces the self-hosted footprint to one binary plus an S3 bucket. The agent work (Pi, agentOS) sits on top as the main workload Rivet is courting.

◆ Prediction

Expect benchmarks and migration guidance for 2.x users during the preview, followed by a 3.0 GA. The entry gives no performance numbers, so the SSD-speed claim is unverified.

S5.0

Stirling PDF is clearing the decks — six weeks of hotfixes ahead of a promised big release.

◆ Current state

Every release in this window is corrective. 2.14.3 fixes tool operations failing on Debian 12 and Fedora 44, concurrency problems on merge, an automation bug in image removal, and crashes on 2GB PDFs, plus Linux startup and a Windows ARM64 test build. Before it, 2.14.2 patched Postgres user-data loading, 2.14.1 stopped PostHog loading before opt flags were read and fixed certificate signing, and 2.13.2 covered security fixes and desktop performance. The one feature release is 2.14.0, which added hardware token signing via PKCS#11 smart cards and OS certificate stores on desktop.

◆ Where it's heading

The project is consolidating a desktop application on top of what was a server tool, and the defect pattern shows where that hurts: platform-specific startup failures, OS certificate integration, ARM64 builds, large-file memory behaviour. Hardware token signing is the strategically interesting piece, since it moves the product toward legally meaningful signatures that a browser-only tool cannot offer. The 2.14.3 notes state a large feature release is two to three weeks out.

◆ Prediction

The changelog explicitly promises a substantial feature release in two to three weeks, and the stabilisation pattern supports that. Hardware token signing spreading beyond desktop-only is the natural extension of the 2.14.0 work.

Alternatives to Rivet and Stirling-PDF

Other DevOps products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Rivet or Stirling-PDF.

See all Rivet alternatives → · See all Stirling-PDF alternatives →

Recent activity from Rivet and Stirling-PDF

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3d agoRivetIntroducing Rivet 3.0 Preview ⚡
  2. 17d agoRivetIntroducing agentOS 0.4 & Hosted VMs
  3. 22d agoRivetIntroducing Pi Durable for Rivet
  4. 24d agoRivetReplacing Our Message Broker with... S3? ⚡
  5. 28d agoRivetIntroducing Pi 1.0 for Rivet
  6. 1mo agoRivetIntroducing JWT Authentication for Rivet Actors
  7. 2mo agoStirling-PDF2.14.3 fixes Debian/Fedora tool failures, concurrency and 2GB PDF crashes
  8. 3mo agoStirling-PDF2.14.2 Hotfix for certain postgres environments
  9. 3mo agoStirling-PDF2.14.1 Bug fixes and new 3rd party license page
  10. 4mo agoStirling-PDF2.14.0 Hardware token signing and shared signing
  11. 4mo agoStirling-PDF2.13.2 Desktop performance fix, and security fixes
  12. 4mo agoStirling-PDF2.13.1 bug fixes for desktop upload from mobile and multitool rotations

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Rivet and Stirling-PDF?

Both compete on the same themes — self-hosted — within DevOps. Rivet is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 5.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Rivet better than Stirling-PDF?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Rivet is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 5.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other DevOps products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Rivet?

Top Rivet alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Rivet alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rivet for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Stirling-PDF?

Top Stirling-PDF alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Stirling-PDF alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/stirling-pdf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.