Twenty
Twenty's ORM v2 migration is down to permission and repository edge cases
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Act and Cognism — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Act! pivots from CRM-only to payment processor while modernizing its Cloud UX.
Act! is in the middle of a methodical Cloud modernization, rebuilding list views, navigation, and notifications to match the consistency users expect from modern CRMs. Alongside that polish work, Act! has just shipped Act! Payments via Propelr — turning the CRM into a place where credit card transactions close, not just leads. The product is still recognizably a small-business CRM, but its surface area is widening.
Cognism's feed is a content-marketing channel, not a changelog — no product changes reach it.
Every entry in this feed is search-targeted editorial about B2B data quality, enrichment and CRM hygiene, plus the occasional customer-win announcement. Nothing here describes a change to the Cognism product: no release notes, no version tags, no feature descriptions. The publishing cadence is high — two posts on 14 August alone — but it measures the marketing team's output, not engineering's.
Act! is in the middle of a methodical Cloud modernization, rebuilding list views, navigation, and notifications to match the consistency users expect from modern CRMs. Alongside that polish work, Act! has just shipped Act! Payments via Propelr — turning the CRM into a place where credit card transactions close, not just leads. The product is still recognizably a small-business CRM, but its surface area is widening.
The release cadence shows two parallel tracks: weekly UX rationalization (notification center, list parity, faster task editing) and category expansion through embedded financial services. Act! is following the same playbook HubSpot and Pipedrive have run — keep the legacy users happy with quality-of-life work while quietly bolting on revenue-bearing features that compete with Stripe-adjacent SMB tools. Payments is the most directional move in years.
Expect deeper payments integration next — recurring billing tied to opportunities, dunning workflows from the contact record, and likely a payments-driven pricing tier that monetizes transaction volume rather than seats.
Every entry in this feed is search-targeted editorial about B2B data quality, enrichment and CRM hygiene, plus the occasional customer-win announcement. Nothing here describes a change to the Cognism product: no release notes, no version tags, no feature descriptions. The publishing cadence is high — two posts on 14 August alone — but it measures the marketing team's output, not engineering's.
The editorial line has drifted toward AI readiness and GTM alignment, arguing that data quality is a precondition for AI-driven revenue workflows rather than a standalone purchase. That is positioning, and it tells you what Cognism wants to sell against, but it is not evidence of shipped capability. Until the feed points at a real changelog, this product's activity here cannot be read as product velocity.
Expect the same two-to-three posts a week on data quality, enrichment and AI-readiness themes. Any actual product change would have to surface through a different source; this feed will not show it.
Other CRM products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Act or Cognism.
Twenty's ORM v2 migration is down to permission and repository edge cases
Phorest lets salons price the stylist, not just the service
Woodpecker's public feed is an SEO content engine, not a changelog.
A daily SEO blog pitching AI service lines to agencies, with no product releases in it.
Two weeks after the platform relaunch, Thryv's feed is all demand generation for it.
Staking the AI-native ATS claim in editorial while shipping nothing visible.
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Act is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Act is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other CRM products to evaluate alongside.
Top Act alternatives in CRM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Act alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/act for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Cognism alternatives in CRM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Cognism alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cognism for the full list with editorial commentary on each.