Recruiterflow
Staking the AI-native ATS claim in editorial while shipping nothing visible.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Easy!Appointments and Phorest — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Self-hosted scheduler adds video-meeting links, then parks 1.6.0 in beta for four months.
Easy!Appointments publishes only pre-release tags — every entry in the feed is an alpha or a beta. The 1.6.0 line, opened in February 2026, is the first to treat online meetings as first-class: Jitsi link generation for public bookings, a Google Meet setting, and a dedicated meeting-link field on appointments. Google Calendar handling was pulled into its own integration section, and providers can now toggle their own syncing.
Phorest lets salons price the stylist, not just the service
Two back-of-house releases landed the same day. Staff pricing can now be set per individual staff member per service, replacing a model where variation came only from branch price or staff category, and it carries through to booking, checkout and online. Alongside it, everything a staff member is qualified for — service, service time, development time, finish time — collapses into one table instead of several screens. Brand creation also stops requiring a support ticket.
Easy!Appointments publishes only pre-release tags — every entry in the feed is an alpha or a beta. The 1.6.0 line, opened in February 2026, is the first to treat online meetings as first-class: Jitsi link generation for public bookings, a Google Meet setting, and a dedicated meeting-link field on appointments. Google Calendar handling was pulled into its own integration section, and providers can now toggle their own syncing.
The product is moving from a booking form toward a scheduler that owns the whole appointment, including where it takes place. The 1.6.0 changelog is cumulative and barely changes between alpha.1, beta.1 and beta.2 — the feature set landed in February and the two betas since have been stabilization passes. The preceding 1.5.x work was almost entirely fixes and permission tightening, which makes 1.6.0 the first feature-bearing cycle in over a year.
The obvious next step is a 1.6.0 stable, but nothing has been tagged since 2026-04-01, so the release is either close or stalled — these entries do not distinguish between the two.
Two back-of-house releases landed the same day. Staff pricing can now be set per individual staff member per service, replacing a model where variation came only from branch price or staff category, and it carries through to booking, checkout and online. Alongside it, everything a staff member is qualified for — service, service time, development time, finish time — collapses into one table instead of several screens. Brand creation also stops requiring a support ticket.
The recent run is consistently about removing steps from daily front-desk and manager work: clock-in by geofence, client lookup on the diary, transactions on the client card, voice notes, and now self-serve brands and consolidated staff setup. The direction is deepening the operational core rather than expanding into new surfaces like marketing or payments.
With pricing now granular to the individual staff member, the pressure moves to reporting — expect the analytics side to gain per-staff revenue views that make the new pricing dimension readable.
Other CRM products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Easy!Appointments or Phorest.
Staking the AI-native ATS claim in editorial while shipping nothing visible.
Twenty's ORM v2 migration is down to permission and repository edge cases
Woodpecker's public feed is an SEO content engine, not a changelog.
A daily SEO blog pitching AI service lines to agencies, with no product releases in it.
Two weeks after the platform relaunch, Thryv's feed is all demand generation for it.
NetHunt's feed is evaluation-stage SEO content, with no product releases visible in it.
See all Easy!Appointments alternatives → · See all Phorest alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Phorest is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Phorest is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other CRM products to evaluate alongside.
Top Easy!Appointments alternatives in CRM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Easy!Appointments alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/easyappointments for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Phorest alternatives in CRM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Phorest alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/phorest for the full list with editorial commentary on each.