Zoho Sign
Zoho Sign adds the EU's highest signature tier, one week after wiring itself to agents.
Comparison · Collab
EGroupware vs Hive
A side-by-side editorial comparison of EGroupware and Hive — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
EGroupware vs Hive: at a glance
What is EGroupware?
EGroupware's feed has become a security treadmill, with the 23.1 branch days from end of life.
Almost every release in this window is a security release, and most ship as a pair — one build for 26.x, an identical-scope backport for 23.1. Feature work exists but arrives as single lines inside those security notes: WebAuthN two-factor moving out of the former EPL add-on, OpenID bumped to current upstream libraries, invoice XML gaining reverse-charge exemption codes. The recurring theme in the fixes themselves is authentication — OAuth bearer tokens, OpenID regressions, an inverted email_verified check, passkeys broken by a missing proxy config.
What is Hive?
Hive ships in batches, and this one is all planning accuracy and admin control.
Hive publishes its changelog as clusters of single-feature entries dated the same day — seven on August 18, three on August 14. The current batch splits between planning integrity (time estimates surviving assignee changes, a rebuilt Unsubmitted Timesheets view, reorderable Gantt columns), governance (a default restricted-member role applied across every onboarding path, custom-field edits appearing in activity feeds), and small chat conveniences. Nothing in the batch is a new product area; it is the existing surface being tightened.
EGroupware vs Hive: editorial side-by-side
EGroupware
5.0COLLAB
EGroupware's feed has become a security treadmill, with the 23.1 branch days from end of life.
◆ Current state
Almost every release in this window is a security release, and most ship as a pair — one build for 26.x, an identical-scope backport for 23.1. Feature work exists but arrives as single lines inside those security notes: WebAuthN two-factor moving out of the former EPL add-on, OpenID bumped to current upstream libraries, invoice XML gaining reverse-charge exemption codes. The recurring theme in the fixes themselves is authentication — OAuth bearer tokens, OpenID regressions, an inverted email_verified check, passkeys broken by a missing proxy config.
◆ Where it's heading
The project is consolidating everyone onto 26.x and has put a date on it: security coverage for 23.1 ends August 15, 2026, repeated as a warning in every 23.1 build since July. After that the twin-release pattern should stop and the cadence should halve. The authentication stack is the least settled part of the codebase right now — the July and August releases keep re-fixing OpenID and WebAuthN regressions introduced by their own predecessors.
◆ Prediction
Expect 23.1 builds to cease after August 15 and the feed to become single-track 26.x. On the evidence of the last six releases, expect at least one more OpenID or WebAuthN regression fix to follow the recent upstream library bump.
Hive
10.0COLLABPM
Hive ships in batches, and this one is all planning accuracy and admin control.
◆ Current state
Hive publishes its changelog as clusters of single-feature entries dated the same day — seven on August 18, three on August 14. The current batch splits between planning integrity (time estimates surviving assignee changes, a rebuilt Unsubmitted Timesheets view, reorderable Gantt columns), governance (a default restricted-member role applied across every onboarding path, custom-field edits appearing in activity feeds), and small chat conveniences. Nothing in the batch is a new product area; it is the existing surface being tightened.
◆ Where it's heading
Two themes have been running through recent batches. The first is making planned time trustworthy — estimates that no longer vanish when work is reassigned, timesheet views built for scanning who has not submitted. The second is administrative control that scales: a least-privilege default that holds across SAML, SCIM, invite links and domain auto-join, and an audit trail that now covers custom-field edits. Both point at larger deployments, where the failure modes are silent data loss and inconsistent permissions rather than missing features.
◆ Prediction
The audit-trail and permissions work looks incomplete rather than finished — activity coverage for other object types and per-field visibility rules are the obvious next steps. Expect the same batched cadence, roughly twice a month.
Alternatives to EGroupware and Hive
Other Collab products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either EGroupware or Hive.
Read the Docs
Read the Docs is rebuilding its build farm around uv and isolated builders, one week at a time.
CommaFeed
CommaFeed is patching its way through the attack surface a self-hosted reader inherits
SiYuan
SiYuan stabilises 3.8.1 after a seven-build beta run, all of it widening the agent surface it opened in 3.8.0
Teable
Teable ships daily, and the work has moved from grid features to platform governance.
Simpplr
Simpplr publishes the research that names the gap, then ships the product that closes it.
See all EGroupware alternatives → · See all Hive alternatives →
Recent activity from EGroupware and Hive
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1d agoHiveDefault new members to a restricted role across every join path
- 1d agoHiveDashboard links unfurl as cards in chat
- 1d agoHiveGantt columns can be reordered and the order sticks
- 1d agoHiveChat statuses can expire automatically
- 1d agoHiveTime estimates survive an assignee change
- 1d agoHiveCustom-field edits now appear in activity feeds
- 7d agoEGroupwareSecurity release fixes passkey regression and OAuth token errors
- 14d agoEGroupware23.1 security release; branch support ends August 15
- 14d agoEGroupwareWebAuthN two-factor moves into core, plus security fixes
- 26d agoEGroupwareSecurity release repairs merge-print and ImportExport regressions
- 26d agoEGroupware23.1 security backport with end-of-support warning
- 1mo agoEGroupwareTwo more security fixes for the 23.1 branch
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between EGroupware and Hive?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Hive is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 10.0 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is EGroupware better than Hive?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Hive is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 10.0 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Collab products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to EGroupware?
Top EGroupware alternatives in Collab are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "EGroupware alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/egroupware for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Hive?
Top Hive alternatives in Collab are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Hive alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/hive for the full list with editorial commentary on each.