← Back to home
Comparison · Collab

EGroupware vs Read the Docs

A side-by-side editorial comparison of EGroupware and Read the Docs — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

EGroupware vs Read the Docs: at a glance

FeatureEGroupwareRead the Docs
SectorCollabCollab
Velocity score5.05.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessecurity, self-hosting, groupware, end-of-lifebuild-infrastructure, uv-migration, isolated-builders, schema-cleanup
Last editorial update7d ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is EGroupware?

EGroupware's feed has become a security treadmill, with the 23.1 branch days from end of life.

Almost every release in this window is a security release, and most ship as a pair — one build for 26.x, an identical-scope backport for 23.1. Feature work exists but arrives as single lines inside those security notes: WebAuthN two-factor moving out of the former EPL add-on, OpenID bumped to current upstream libraries, invoice XML gaining reverse-charge exemption codes. The recurring theme in the fixes themselves is authentication — OAuth bearer tokens, OpenID regressions, an inverted email_verified check, passkeys broken by a missing proxy config.

Read the full EGroupware trajectory →

What is Read the Docs?

Read the Docs is rebuilding its build farm around uv and isolated builders, one week at a time.

Weekly date-tagged releases, almost entirely build infrastructure. The visible work is a migration to uv-managed environments and isolated, ephemeral builders, shipped in small increments between routine dependency bumps. The two most recent releases are the quietest of the run: plumbing for uv and build status in one, and a video extension bump, a nullable-field step toward dropping has_valid_clone, and Python 3.14 for the pip-tools workflow in the other.

Read the full Read the Docs trajectory →

EGroupware vs Read the Docs: editorial side-by-side

E5.0

EGroupware's feed has become a security treadmill, with the 23.1 branch days from end of life.

◆ Current state

Almost every release in this window is a security release, and most ship as a pair — one build for 26.x, an identical-scope backport for 23.1. Feature work exists but arrives as single lines inside those security notes: WebAuthN two-factor moving out of the former EPL add-on, OpenID bumped to current upstream libraries, invoice XML gaining reverse-charge exemption codes. The recurring theme in the fixes themselves is authentication — OAuth bearer tokens, OpenID regressions, an inverted email_verified check, passkeys broken by a missing proxy config.

◆ Where it's heading

The project is consolidating everyone onto 26.x and has put a date on it: security coverage for 23.1 ends August 15, 2026, repeated as a warning in every 23.1 build since July. After that the twin-release pattern should stop and the cadence should halve. The authentication stack is the least settled part of the codebase right now — the July and August releases keep re-fixing OpenID and WebAuthN regressions introduced by their own predecessors.

◆ Prediction

Expect 23.1 builds to cease after August 15 and the feed to become single-track 26.x. On the evidence of the last six releases, expect at least one more OpenID or WebAuthN regression fix to follow the recent upstream library bump.

R5.0

Read the Docs is rebuilding its build farm around uv and isolated builders, one week at a time.

◆ Current state

Weekly date-tagged releases, almost entirely build infrastructure. The visible work is a migration to uv-managed environments and isolated, ephemeral builders, shipped in small increments between routine dependency bumps. The two most recent releases are the quietest of the run: plumbing for uv and build status in one, and a video extension bump, a nullable-field step toward dropping has_valid_clone, and Python 3.14 for the pip-tools workflow in the other.

◆ Where it's heading

The isolated builder is the arc worth tracking — private repository support, an ephemeral builder script, and removal of the old scale-in protection path all point at builds that run in disposable environments. Alongside it runs a quieter cleanup pattern: fields are made nullable before removal, feature flags are deleted once the code behind them lands, and Python versions are pushed forward in the tooling before the runtime. User-facing change is rare and arrives as a side effect, as when July's release moved images to Ubuntu 26.04 and Python 3.14.

◆ Prediction

Expect the isolated builder to become the default path and further uv environment fixes; the has_valid_clone column being made nullable signals its removal in a following release. Feature work should stay secondary until that migration finishes.

Alternatives to EGroupware and Read the Docs

Other Collab products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either EGroupware or Read the Docs.

See all EGroupware alternatives → · See all Read the Docs alternatives →

Recent activity from EGroupware and Read the Docs

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 21h agoRead the Docshas_valid_clone made nullable before removal; tooling bumps
  2. 7d agoRead the DocsBuild status skipped for commit-less builds; uv venv path fix
  3. 7d agoEGroupwareSecurity release fixes passkey regression and OAuth token errors
  4. 14d agoRead the DocsIsolated builders gain private-repo support and uv installs
  5. 14d agoEGroupware23.1 security release; branch support ends August 15
  6. 14d agoEGroupwareWebAuthN two-factor moves into core, plus security fixes
  7. 21d agoRead the DocsDependency-only maintenance release
  8. 26d agoEGroupwareSecurity release repairs merge-print and ImportExport regressions
  9. 26d agoEGroupware23.1 security backport with end-of-support warning
  10. 28d agoRead the DocsEphemeral builders land; subproject aliases accept slashes
  11. 1mo agoEGroupwareTwo more security fixes for the 23.1 branch
  12. 1mo agoRead the DocsUbuntu 26.04 and Python 3.14 build images; automation fixes

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between EGroupware and Read the Docs?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. EGroupware and Read the Docs are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 5.0 vs 5.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is EGroupware better than Read the Docs?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. EGroupware and Read the Docs are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 5.0 vs 5.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Collab products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to EGroupware?

Top EGroupware alternatives in Collab are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "EGroupware alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/egroupware for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Read the Docs?

Top Read the Docs alternatives in Collab are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Read the Docs alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/read-the-docs for the full list with editorial commentary on each.