← Back to home
Comparison · Collab

CoScreen vs Wiki.js

A side-by-side editorial comparison of CoScreen and Wiki.js — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

CoScreen vs Wiki.js: at a glance

FeatureCoScreenWiki.js
SectorCollabCollab
Velocity score3.86.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themesend-of-life, screen-sharing, collaboration, sunsetwiki, knowledge-base, mcp, governance
Last editorial update3mo ago3d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is CoScreen?

CoScreen ships its final build and declares End of Life after a year of quiet.

CoScreen just shipped V8.11.14, explicitly labeled its final software update, alongside an official End of Life announcement. The last real feature release was V8.10 in August 2025 (screen-region sharing plus macOS Tahoe support); the eleven months since produced nothing but this shutdown notice. The multiplayer, multi-window screen-sharing tool for remote teams is being retired rather than iterated.

Read the full CoScreen trajectory →

What is Wiki.js?

Wiki.js 3.0 beta ships an MCP server so AI agents can work against the wiki directly.

Wiki.js 3.0 is still a beta not meant for production, but beta.705 adds a built-in MCP server, refined personal access token scopes, page lifecycle rules with page ownership, a feedback board where reviewers manage ideas, and link completion in the markdown editor. Recent betas added live notes, math, access tokens, SCIM and Excalidraw collaboration.

Read the full Wiki.js trajectory →

CoScreen vs Wiki.js: editorial side-by-side

C
CoScreen
COLLAB
3.8

CoScreen ships its final build and declares End of Life after a year of quiet.

◆ Current state

CoScreen just shipped V8.11.14, explicitly labeled its final software update, alongside an official End of Life announcement. The last real feature release was V8.10 in August 2025 (screen-region sharing plus macOS Tahoe support); the eleven months since produced nothing but this shutdown notice. The multiplayer, multi-window screen-sharing tool for remote teams is being retired rather than iterated.

◆ Where it's heading

The cadence tells the story: steady usability and performance work through 2024 and into early 2025, a last genuine feature drop in August 2025, then silence until today's EOL. This is a sunset, not a pivot. Users can expect the app to keep running on 8.11.14 but to receive no further fixes or OS-compatibility updates.

◆ Prediction

With EOL declared and a final build shipped, the only moves left are wind-down mechanics: a hard shutdown date, export or migration guidance, and eventual removal from distribution. No further feature work is coming.

W
Wiki.js
COLLAB
6.3

Wiki.js 3.0 beta ships an MCP server so AI agents can work against the wiki directly.

◆ Current state

Wiki.js 3.0 is still a beta not meant for production, but beta.705 adds a built-in MCP server, refined personal access token scopes, page lifecycle rules with page ownership, a feedback board where reviewers manage ideas, and link completion in the markdown editor. Recent betas added live notes, math, access tokens, SCIM and Excalidraw collaboration.

◆ Where it's heading

Each beta adds a piece that larger teams need: SSO and SCIM, governance through ownership and lifecycle rules, and now machine access through MCP and scoped tokens. 3.0 is becoming an AI-accessible knowledge base with enterprise controls rather than a straight successor to 2.x.

◆ Prediction

Expect MCP tools to be tied to the new PAT scopes and page rules, and the beta cadence to keep adding governance features before a release candidate.

Alternatives to CoScreen and Wiki.js

Other Collab products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either CoScreen or Wiki.js.

See all CoScreen alternatives → · See all Wiki.js alternatives →

Recent activity from CoScreen and Wiki.js

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3d agoWiki.jsWiki.js 3.0 beta adds MCP server and page lifecycle rules ⚡
  2. 9d agoWiki.jsWiki.js 3 beta adds live notes publishable to pages
  3. 13d agoWiki.jsWiki.js 3 beta adds math, access tokens; requires Postgres 17
  4. 16d agoWiki.jsWiki.js 3 beta adds draft recovery, slash menu, multi-replica git sync
  5. 18d agoWiki.js3.0 beta adds OIDC/SAML claim options and hardens v2 import
  6. 20d agoWiki.jsWiki.js 3.0 beta adds glossary auto-linking and non-Latin paths
  7. 3mo agoCoScreenV8.11.14 Final Software Update ⚡
  8. 1y agoCoScreenV8.10 Screen Region Sharing & macOS Tahoe Support
  9. 1y agoCoScreenV8.2.119 New remote window top bar and focus mode
  10. 2y agoCoScreenV8.1.57 New video layouts and open URLs of shared browser windows
  11. 2y agoCoScreenV7.10.144: Update for enterprise access
  12. 2y agoCoScreenV7.10.41: Bug fixes

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between CoScreen and Wiki.js?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Wiki.js is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 3.8), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is CoScreen better than Wiki.js?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Wiki.js is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 3.8), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Collab products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to CoScreen?

Top CoScreen alternatives in Collab are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "CoScreen alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/coscreen for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Wiki.js?

Top Wiki.js alternatives in Collab are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Wiki.js alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/wikijs for the full list with editorial commentary on each.