Sleekplan
Sleekplan rebuilt itself around AI triage, then put the feedback board inside ChatGPT.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Olark and Plain — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
| Feature | Olark | Plain |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Support | Support |
| Velocity score | 0.0 | 8.8 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 3 |
| Top themes | customer support, ai assistants, ui rebuild, knowledge ingestion | customer-support, ai-agents, mcp, agent-governance |
| Last editorial update | 3mo ago | 12h ago |
| Website | — | Visit → |
Olark rebuilds around v2 — new layout, AI Assistants surface, in-product bot evaluation.
Olark is mid-rollout of v2, a full interface rebuild that landed in mid-2025. The AI Assistants area is now structured around Knowledge / Persona / Evaluation tabs, with bot review and feedback (thumbs up/down on individual answers) happening directly in-product. Knowledge ingestion has expanded to JSON and ZIP files plus much larger website crawls. Smaller v2 quality-of-life touches keep landing — collapsed agent menus, static offline messages, Group ID exposure for API users.
Plain built an autonomous support agent, and has now built the controls to trust it.
Plain's changelog is dated entries with no titles, and nearly all of it concerns two AI surfaces: Ari, the customer-facing responder, and Sidekick, the internal agent. Sidekick spent July gaining reach — its own full-page home, reusable workspace skills, and connection to arbitrary MCP servers. The newest release turns to Ari and adds what was missing around it: a way to test it before customers see it, provenance behind each answer, configurable tone, and explicit escalation rules.
Olark is mid-rollout of v2, a full interface rebuild that landed in mid-2025. The AI Assistants area is now structured around Knowledge / Persona / Evaluation tabs, with bot review and feedback (thumbs up/down on individual answers) happening directly in-product. Knowledge ingestion has expanded to JSON and ZIP files plus much larger website crawls. Smaller v2 quality-of-life touches keep landing — collapsed agent menus, static offline messages, Group ID exposure for API users.
The product is being rebuilt around AI-assisted chat support, not bolted on. The Evaluation tab in particular signals a closed-loop training direction — agents tune the bot from real conversations rather than configuring it abstractly. v2 is also shedding classic settings page by page; expect that migration to keep producing visible incremental wins.
Next moves likely deepen the bot evaluation loop — automatic quality scoring, suggested knowledge updates from low-rated answers — and continue retiring classic surfaces. A pricing/tiering revisit around AI usage is plausible once the v2 migration has run its course.
Plain's changelog is dated entries with no titles, and nearly all of it concerns two AI surfaces: Ari, the customer-facing responder, and Sidekick, the internal agent. Sidekick spent July gaining reach — its own full-page home, reusable workspace skills, and connection to arbitrary MCP servers. The newest release turns to Ari and adds what was missing around it: a way to test it before customers see it, provenance behind each answer, configurable tone, and explicit escalation rules.
The sequence reads as capability first, then governance. Plain rebuilt Ari into an agentic first responder, opened Sidekick to any MCP server, and let teams write skills the whole workspace shares — all of which widen what the agents can do and reach. The current release closes the loop the other way, making that autonomy inspectable and bounded before it is switched on. That is the order support-AI vendors have to complete in: teams will not put an agent in front of customers on capability claims alone.
With testing and provenance in place, the next step is likely measurement — resolution and escalation rates per skill, or per-answer quality review feeding back into the skills teams write. The entries are short summaries linking off-site, so per-release depth is limited.
Other Support products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Olark or Plain.
Sleekplan rebuilt itself around AI triage, then put the feedback board inside ChatGPT.
Comm100 publishes steadily about AI support — none of it is Comm100 shipping anything.
respond.io is layering an agent-authoring copilot and consumption billing on top of its omnichannel inbox.
Hatz sells through MSPs, and its roadmap has started to serve the partner more than the end user
A teaser-only content feed making one argument: AI in the contact center fails on knowledge, not models.
A steady SEO blog on SMS basics, with the occasional ecommerce integration walkthrough.
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Plain is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 8.8 vs 0.0), with 3 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Plain is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 8.8 vs 0.0), with 3 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Support products to evaluate alongside.
Top Olark alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Olark alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/olark for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Plain alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Plain alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/plain for the full list with editorial commentary on each.