Twenty
Twenty 2.52 lets apps run their own account-connection flows and adds inbox sharing.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Close CRM and Espocrm — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Close takes Chloe Chat out of beta for every customer, a month after OIDC SSO.
Close is shipping on three tracks. Its assistant Chloe is now generally available as Chloe Chat, answering pipeline questions, preparing a rep's day, analyzing data and taking actions from any page. Voice agents run on the rebuilt telephony layer with skills like Schedule Meeting, and the October 13 release added a central Security page with OIDC single sign-on alongside update-only Workflow triggers.
EspoCRM leans on content marketing while 9.x releases ship quietly.
The EspoCRM feed is dominated by blog content — building customer portals, no-code CRM customization, European data-control thought leadership, HubSpot comparisons — alongside terse 9.2 and 9.3 release notes. Visible product directional change is limited; the channel reads more like marketing than engineering shipping.
Close is shipping on three tracks. Its assistant Chloe is now generally available as Chloe Chat, answering pipeline questions, preparing a rep's day, analyzing data and taking actions from any page. Voice agents run on the rebuilt telephony layer with skills like Schedule Meeting, and the October 13 release added a central Security page with OIDC single sign-on alongside update-only Workflow triggers.
Chloe has moved from a beta chat to the default way into the app: a command-palette fallback in September, notification threads, and now GA for all accounts. Paired with voice agents that act on phone numbers and Workflows that react to record updates, Close is building a CRM where assistants and automation do more of the work, with SSO and a security page arriving as the governance layer that buyers ask for.
Expect Chloe to gain more write actions and to connect with Workflows or voice-agent skills now that it is GA; the truncated entry doesn't list which actions it can take today.
The EspoCRM feed is dominated by blog content — building customer portals, no-code CRM customization, European data-control thought leadership, HubSpot comparisons — alongside terse 9.2 and 9.3 release notes. Visible product directional change is limited; the channel reads more like marketing than engineering shipping.
The clearest pattern is a positioning push around EspoCRM as a self-hosted, customization-first CRM aimed at European and privacy-conscious buyers, rather than a feature reinvention. Release notes when they appear are minimal (9.2, 9.3 with PHP 8.5 support), suggesting steady-state maintenance more than directional change.
The combined emphasis on data control, no-code customization, and HubSpot-alternative messaging suggests continued investment in EU-friendly self-hosted CRM positioning over capability expansion, but the published feed does not give enough signal to predict specific feature moves with confidence.
Other CRM products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Close CRM or Espocrm.
Twenty 2.52 lets apps run their own account-connection flows and adds inbox sharing.
Twenty 2.53 lets apps lock field permission actions, a day after role-aware relation pickers.
IntegCRM keeps building out invoicing, bookings, forms and email for service businesses.
folk ships a French interface weeks after moving its data storage to Europe.
GroupOffice patches its current 26.0 line and the older 25.0 line on the same afternoon.
Corteza 2026.9.0 goes final after a week of single-fix candidates.
See all Close CRM alternatives → · See all Espocrm alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Close CRM is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Close CRM is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other CRM products to evaluate alongside.
Top Close CRM alternatives in CRM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Close CRM alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/close-crm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Espocrm alternatives in CRM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Espocrm alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/espocrm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.