Twenty
Twenty 2.52 lets apps run their own account-connection flows and adds inbox sharing.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Close CRM and Groundhogg — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Close takes Chloe Chat out of beta for every customer, a month after OIDC SSO.
Close is shipping on three tracks. Its assistant Chloe is now generally available as Chloe Chat, answering pipeline questions, preparing a rep's day, analyzing data and taking actions from any page. Voice agents run on the rebuilt telephony layer with skills like Schedule Meeting, and the October 13 release added a central Security page with OIDC single sign-on alongside update-only Workflow triggers.
Groundhogg keeps refining its flow editor and broadcasts, but the feed has gone quiet.
The visible releases center on the journey/flow editor and email operations: 4.0 rebuilt the flow editor with visual branching and conditions, 4.2.6 added per-contact frequency limits on flow triggers, and 3.6-3.7 improved dynamic broadcast segments, batching, and a personalized dashboard. Adjacent addons (Conditional Logic, Countdown Timers, Companies) got parallel upgrades. The newest entry is October 2025, so the recent picture is dated.
Close is shipping on three tracks. Its assistant Chloe is now generally available as Chloe Chat, answering pipeline questions, preparing a rep's day, analyzing data and taking actions from any page. Voice agents run on the rebuilt telephony layer with skills like Schedule Meeting, and the October 13 release added a central Security page with OIDC single sign-on alongside update-only Workflow triggers.
Chloe has moved from a beta chat to the default way into the app: a command-palette fallback in September, notification threads, and now GA for all accounts. Paired with voice agents that act on phone numbers and Workflows that react to record updates, Close is building a CRM where assistants and automation do more of the work, with SSO and a security page arriving as the governance layer that buyers ask for.
Expect Chloe to gain more write actions and to connect with Workflows or voice-agent skills now that it is GA; the truncated entry doesn't list which actions it can take today.
The visible releases center on the journey/flow editor and email operations: 4.0 rebuilt the flow editor with visual branching and conditions, 4.2.6 added per-contact frequency limits on flow triggers, and 3.6-3.7 improved dynamic broadcast segments, batching, and a personalized dashboard. Adjacent addons (Conditional Logic, Countdown Timers, Companies) got parallel upgrades. The newest entry is October 2025, so the recent picture is dated.
Groundhogg is maturing its marketing-automation core (branching journeys, segmentation, deliverability controls) toward parity with hosted platforms rather than staking out new ground. Momentum is steady and incremental across core plus addons.
Feed staleness makes a confident call hard; on the visible pattern the next moves would continue flow-editor and broadcast refinements rather than a new capability.
Other CRM products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Close CRM or Groundhogg.
Twenty 2.52 lets apps run their own account-connection flows and adds inbox sharing.
Twenty 2.53 lets apps lock field permission actions, a day after role-aware relation pickers.
IntegCRM keeps building out invoicing, bookings, forms and email for service businesses.
folk ships a French interface weeks after moving its data storage to Europe.
GroupOffice patches its current 26.0 line and the older 25.0 line on the same afternoon.
Corteza 2026.9.0 goes final after a week of single-fix candidates.
See all Close CRM alternatives → · See all Groundhogg alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Close CRM is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Close CRM is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other CRM products to evaluate alongside.
Top Close CRM alternatives in CRM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Close CRM alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/close-crm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Groundhogg alternatives in CRM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Groundhogg alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/groundhogg for the full list with editorial commentary on each.