Plain
Plain built an autonomous support agent, and has now built the controls to trust it.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Frill and Olark — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
| Feature | Frill | Olark |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Support | Support |
| Velocity score | 6.3 | 0.0 |
| Sparks · 30d | 1 | 0 |
| Top themes | feedback-management, mcp, ai-summaries, programmatic-access | customer support, ai assistants, ui rebuild, knowledge ingestion |
| Last editorial update | 5d ago | 3mo ago |
| Website | Visit → | — |
Frill is turning its feedback board from a destination into something machines read on demand.
The MCP server is the centrepiece: ten tools, one API key, no configuration, callable from Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or Intercom Fin, and included on every plan rather than gated. The Chrome extension follows the same instinct from the capture side — grab an idea wherever you spot it, and collapse a long help desk thread into a clean idea with an AI summary in one click. Behind both sits the June groundwork: a public npm SDK, multiple API keys, webhook handling, and MCP in public beta.
Olark rebuilds around v2 — new layout, AI Assistants surface, in-product bot evaluation.
Olark is mid-rollout of v2, a full interface rebuild that landed in mid-2025. The AI Assistants area is now structured around Knowledge / Persona / Evaluation tabs, with bot review and feedback (thumbs up/down on individual answers) happening directly in-product. Knowledge ingestion has expanded to JSON and ZIP files plus much larger website crawls. Smaller v2 quality-of-life touches keep landing — collapsed agent menus, static offline messages, Group ID exposure for API users.
The MCP server is the centrepiece: ten tools, one API key, no configuration, callable from Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or Intercom Fin, and included on every plan rather than gated. The Chrome extension follows the same instinct from the capture side — grab an idea wherever you spot it, and collapse a long help desk thread into a clean idea with an AI summary in one click. Behind both sits the June groundwork: a public npm SDK, multiple API keys, webhook handling, and MCP in public beta.
Frill is systematically removing the requirement to be in Frill. Capture moves to wherever the conversation already happens; retrieval moves to whatever assistant the team already uses. That reframes the product as the feedback store rather than the feedback interface, and the pricing decision reinforces it — putting MCP on every plan optimises for the corpus being queried, not for upsell. The earlier enterprise work (EU hosting, EntraID SSO, CSP) is what makes that store trustworthy enough to hold the data.
Expect write paths to follow the read paths — an assistant that can already ask what users want will next be expected to file, merge and status ideas — and expect more capture surfaces beyond the browser extension.
Olark is mid-rollout of v2, a full interface rebuild that landed in mid-2025. The AI Assistants area is now structured around Knowledge / Persona / Evaluation tabs, with bot review and feedback (thumbs up/down on individual answers) happening directly in-product. Knowledge ingestion has expanded to JSON and ZIP files plus much larger website crawls. Smaller v2 quality-of-life touches keep landing — collapsed agent menus, static offline messages, Group ID exposure for API users.
The product is being rebuilt around AI-assisted chat support, not bolted on. The Evaluation tab in particular signals a closed-loop training direction — agents tune the bot from real conversations rather than configuring it abstractly. v2 is also shedding classic settings page by page; expect that migration to keep producing visible incremental wins.
Next moves likely deepen the bot evaluation loop — automatic quality scoring, suggested knowledge updates from low-rated answers — and continue retiring classic surfaces. A pricing/tiering revisit around AI usage is plausible once the v2 migration has run its course.
Other Support products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Frill or Olark.
Plain built an autonomous support agent, and has now built the controls to trust it.
Sleekplan rebuilt itself around AI triage, then put the feedback board inside ChatGPT.
Comm100 publishes steadily about AI support — none of it is Comm100 shipping anything.
respond.io is layering an agent-authoring copilot and consumption billing on top of its omnichannel inbox.
Hatz sells through MSPs, and its roadmap has started to serve the partner more than the end user
A teaser-only content feed making one argument: AI in the contact center fails on knowledge, not models.
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Frill is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Frill is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Support products to evaluate alongside.
Top Frill alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Frill alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/frill for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Olark alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Olark alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/olark for the full list with editorial commentary on each.