← Back to home
Comparison · Support

LiveAgent vs Request Tracker

A side-by-side editorial comparison of LiveAgent and Request Tracker — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

LiveAgent vs Request Tracker: at a glance

FeatureLiveAgentRequest Tracker
SectorSupportSupport
Velocity score6.30.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescustomer-support, ai-providers, translation, voiceticketing, security-releases, multi-branch, cve
Last editorial update1d ago2mo ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is LiveAgent?

LiveAgent's 5.70 branch adds Mistral and Gemini, live call transcription and message translation.

LiveAgent's 5.70 branch arrived with a large feature batch: Mistral AI as an EU-hosted provider, Gemini and OpenAI for ticket summaries and translation, live call transcription with speaker attribution, and on-demand translation of inbound messages. It also adds a Deskpro migration plugin and plan limits on event, time and SLA rules. The releases since are fix-only, mostly around chat widget errors and API gaps.

Read the full LiveAgent trajectory →

What is Request Tracker?

Request Tracker maintains three branches in lockstep, and security is what sets the release calendar.

Best Practical ships RT across three concurrent branches, 4.4, 5.0 and 6.0, and coordinates security releases across all of them on the same day. The most recent pair, 5.0.10 and 6.0.3, both landed on 2026-05-20 carrying the same fixes: a privilege escalation and credential disclosure through the REST 2.0 user collection endpoint (CVE-2026-44231), SQL injection via the entry_aggregator parameter in JSON search (CVE-2026-41075), and an LDAP authentication bypass. Feature work rides along on the 6.0 branch, while 5.0 and 4.4 receive security fixes and little else.

Read the full Request Tracker trajectory →

LiveAgent vs Request Tracker: editorial side-by-side

LiveAgent logo
LiveAgent
SUPPORT
6.3

LiveAgent's 5.70 branch adds Mistral and Gemini, live call transcription and message translation.

◆ Current state

LiveAgent's 5.70 branch arrived with a large feature batch: Mistral AI as an EU-hosted provider, Gemini and OpenAI for ticket summaries and translation, live call transcription with speaker attribution, and on-demand translation of inbound messages. It also adds a Deskpro migration plugin and plan limits on event, time and SLA rules. The releases since are fix-only, mostly around chat widget errors and API gaps.

◆ Where it's heading

The AI layer is turning multi-provider: OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini and Mistral now sit side by side, with retired OpenAI models migrated automatically. Voice and translation are where that layer is being applied first. The paired 5.69 and 5.70 releases on the same day show two branches being maintained in parallel.

◆ Prediction

Expect message translation to move past its 'Stage 1' on-demand scope, likely toward outbound or automatic translation. Further 5.69/5.70 fix pairs are likely in the meantime.

R0.0

Request Tracker maintains three branches in lockstep, and security is what sets the release calendar.

◆ Current state

Best Practical ships RT across three concurrent branches, 4.4, 5.0 and 6.0, and coordinates security releases across all of them on the same day. The most recent pair, 5.0.10 and 6.0.3, both landed on 2026-05-20 carrying the same fixes: a privilege escalation and credential disclosure through the REST 2.0 user collection endpoint (CVE-2026-44231), SQL injection via the entry_aggregator parameter in JSON search (CVE-2026-41075), and an LDAP authentication bypass. Feature work rides along on the 6.0 branch, while 5.0 and 4.4 receive security fixes and little else.

◆ Where it's heading

The branch structure is consolidating. RT 4.4 reached its last planned release at 4.4.9 in October 2025, with users pointed at 5 or 6, and 6.0 is where features now land: dashboard saved searches gained pagination and sorting, statuses take colors from lifecycle configuration, custom fields display multi-column by default, and keyboard menu navigation improved. The 5.0 line still gets real work but of a narrower kind, such as the inline CSS handling in ticket history that shipped with 5.0.10. Expect the same-day multi-branch security release to remain the pattern for as long as two branches are supported.

◆ Prediction

The next release is most likely another coordinated security pair on 5.0 and 6.0, with feature work continuing to accumulate only on 6.0.

Alternatives to LiveAgent and Request Tracker

Other Support products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either LiveAgent or Request Tracker.

See all LiveAgent alternatives → · See all Request Tracker alternatives →

Recent activity from LiveAgent and Request Tracker

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2d agoLiveAgent5.69.6: chat widget errors and stale Claude model picker fixed
  2. 2d agoLiveAgent5.70.2: chat widget start failures and refusal reasons fixed
  3. 3d agoLiveAgent5.70.2: security fix, call recordings back in APIv3 messages
  4. 9d agoLiveAgent5.70.2: Mistral and Gemini, live call transcripts, translation
  5. 10d agoLiveAgent5.69.6 fixes chats showing another chat's messages
  6. 10d agoLiveAgent5.68.9 backports chat-mixup and transcription fixes
  7. 5mo agoRequest TrackerSecurity release fixes REST 2.0 credential disclosure and SQL injection
  8. 5mo agoRequest TrackerSame security fixes as 5.0.10, plus dashboard and accessibility work
  9. 1y agoRequest TrackerCalendar view for saved searches and memory management work
  10. 1y agoRequest TrackerCSV injection fix in TSV export, with assorted updates
  11. 1y agoRequest TrackerFinal RT 4.4 release closes the branch with one security fix
  12. 1y agoRequest TrackerRelease exists mainly to support RTIR 6.0.1

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between LiveAgent and Request Tracker?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. LiveAgent is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is LiveAgent better than Request Tracker?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. LiveAgent is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Support products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to LiveAgent?

Top LiveAgent alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "LiveAgent alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/liveagent for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Request Tracker?

Top Request Tracker alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Request Tracker alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/request-tracker for the full list with editorial commentary on each.