Respond.io
respond.io is widening what a conversation can hold - more channels, and now more than one owner.
Comparison · Support
Hatz AI vs Infobip
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Hatz AI and Infobip — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Hatz AI vs Infobip: at a glance
| Feature | Hatz AI | Infobip |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Support | Support, Comms |
| Velocity score | 6.3 | 0.0 |
| Sparks · 30d | 1 | 0 |
| Top themes | msp-channel, phone-agents, model-selector, multi-tenant-admin | cpaas, ai-agents, mcp, omnichannel |
| Last editorial update | 4d ago | 20d ago |
| Website | — | Visit → |
What is Hatz AI?
Hatz sells through MSPs, and its roadmap has started to serve the partner more than the end user
Most of Hatz's window is model-selector maintenance — Claude Opus 5, Kimi K3, GLM 5.2 Fast, DeepSeek V4 Flash, the Gemini 3.x line — plus a steady buildout of the phone agent, which has gained pausing, duplication, reassignment, drafts, silence tolerance, business hours, and caller memory. Against that routine, Hatz Activate stands apart: a rollout console built for the managed service providers who resell the platform.
What is Infobip?
A CPaaS rebuilding around AI agents that act, not just channels that deliver
Infobip publishes quarterly roll-ups, and the feed stores each quarter twice — once as a bare label, once as the summary paragraph. Across Q3 2025 to Q1 2026 the through-line is consistent: AgentOS unifying the communication stack, AI agents that take action rather than reply, MCP servers connecting models to real channels, and AI voice work under Vocalize, against continued WhatsApp, RCS and CDP investment.
Hatz AI vs Infobip: editorial side-by-side
Hatz AI
6.3SUPPORT
Hatz sells through MSPs, and its roadmap has started to serve the partner more than the end user
◆ Current state
Most of Hatz's window is model-selector maintenance — Claude Opus 5, Kimi K3, GLM 5.2 Fast, DeepSeek V4 Flash, the Gemini 3.x line — plus a steady buildout of the phone agent, which has gained pausing, duplication, reassignment, drafts, silence tolerance, business hours, and caller memory. Against that routine, Hatz Activate stands apart: a rollout console built for the managed service providers who resell the platform.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in parallel. The phone agent is being hardened into a product an MSP can deploy repeatedly across client sites — duplicate it onto a new number, reassign it to a different tenant, cap its minutes — while Activate supplies the partner with the shadow-AI scan and enablement material that starts the sales conversation. Model additions continue but carry no direction; they are table stakes restated every few weeks.
◆ Prediction
Expect more tenant- and partner-scoped administration, since renaming tenants and invoicing over the API both landed this window and point at MSPs managing many clients programmatically. The phone agent's usage-based pricing suggests metering and limits will keep expanding ahead of any new end-user capability.
Infobip
0.0SUPPORTCOMMS
A CPaaS rebuilding around AI agents that act, not just channels that deliver
◆ Current state
Infobip publishes quarterly roll-ups, and the feed stores each quarter twice — once as a bare label, once as the summary paragraph. Across Q3 2025 to Q1 2026 the through-line is consistent: AgentOS unifying the communication stack, AI agents that take action rather than reply, MCP servers connecting models to real channels, and AI voice work under Vocalize, against continued WhatsApp, RCS and CDP investment.
◆ Where it's heading
The company is repositioning from delivering messages to running autonomous customer interactions on top of them. Channels are becoming the substrate; the product being sold is the agent layer above. MCP servers matter most here — they make Infobip's channel reach callable by models a customer already runs, rather than requiring Infobip's own agent builder.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next quarterly to lead with AgentOS depth — orchestration, handoff and measurement across agents — since the channel and MCP groundwork it needs has now shipped over three consecutive quarters.
Alternatives to Hatz AI and Infobip
Other Support products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Hatz AI or Infobip.
Live Helper Chat
Live Helper Chat keeps adding the oversight surfaces a supervised support floor needs.
LiveAgent
Two maintained branches, a build-stamp version scheme, and a steady diet of defect fixes.
Sleekplan
Post-rebuild Sleekplan is adding the objects a feedback board never had: docs and components.
Plain
Plain built an autonomous support agent, and has now built the controls to trust it.
Comm100
Comm100 publishes steadily about AI support — none of it is Comm100 shipping anything.
See all Hatz AI alternatives → · See all Infobip alternatives →
Recent activity from Hatz AI and Infobip
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 6d agoHatz AIAttachment-Only Messages, Tenant Renaming, Invoices Over the API, Phone Agent Drafts and Silence Controls
- 12d agoHatz AIDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, Self-Reporting Credit Usage, Phone Agent Pause/Reassign/Duplicate, Artifact Presentation Mode, Auto-Tool Selection Notice
- 15d agoHatz AIHatz Activate: a Shadow AI scan and an MSP rollout console ⚡
- 19d agoHatz AIAutoTool v2, Optimized Phone Agent Pricing, MSP Workshop Categories for Agents
- 21d agoHatz AIKimi K3, GLM 5.2 Fast
- 26d agoHatz AIClaude Opus 5
- 4mo agoInfobipQ1 2026
- 4mo agoInfobipQ1 2026: AgentOS and MCP servers across channels ⚡
- 4mo agoInfobipQ4 2025
- 4mo agoInfobipQ4 2025: MCP servers, RCS onboarding and CDP schemas
- 5mo agoInfobipQ3 2025
- 5mo agoInfobipQ3 2025: WhatsApp Business Calling and Vocalize
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Hatz AI and Infobip?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Hatz AI is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Hatz AI better than Infobip?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Hatz AI is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Support products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Hatz AI?
Top Hatz AI alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Hatz AI alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/hatz-ai for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Infobip?
Top Infobip alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Infobip alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/infobip for the full list with editorial commentary on each.