← Back to home
Comparison · Support

Hatz AI vs Xurrent

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Hatz AI and Xurrent — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Hatz AI vs Xurrent: at a glance

FeatureHatz AIXurrent
SectorSupportSupport
Velocity score6.36.3
Sparks · 30d10
Top themesmsp-channel, phone-agents, model-selector, multi-tenant-adminagentic-itsm, sera-ai, cmdb, self-service
Last editorial update4d ago11d ago
WebsiteVisit →

What is Hatz AI?

Hatz sells through MSPs, and its roadmap has started to serve the partner more than the end user

Most of Hatz's window is model-selector maintenance — Claude Opus 5, Kimi K3, GLM 5.2 Fast, DeepSeek V4 Flash, the Gemini 3.x line — plus a steady buildout of the phone agent, which has gained pausing, duplication, reassignment, drafts, silence tolerance, business hours, and caller memory. Against that routine, Hatz Activate stands apart: a rollout console built for the managed service providers who resell the platform.

Read the full Hatz AI trajectory →

What is Xurrent?

Sera AI crosses from assistant to autonomous agent while the ITSM core keeps its monthly grind.

Xurrent ships on a disciplined monthly cadence, and the last quarter splits cleanly in two. One half is steady ITSM plumbing — shared tags across Requests, Problems, Workflows and Projects, CMDB reconciliation that a human can actually read, iPaaS connectors, self-service reservations. The other half is Sera AI, which moved from a chat widget to a configurable studio and then, on 10 July, to two agents that act without a person in the loop.

Read the full Xurrent trajectory →

Hatz AI vs Xurrent: editorial side-by-side

H
Hatz AI
SUPPORT
6.3

Hatz sells through MSPs, and its roadmap has started to serve the partner more than the end user

◆ Current state

Most of Hatz's window is model-selector maintenance — Claude Opus 5, Kimi K3, GLM 5.2 Fast, DeepSeek V4 Flash, the Gemini 3.x line — plus a steady buildout of the phone agent, which has gained pausing, duplication, reassignment, drafts, silence tolerance, business hours, and caller memory. Against that routine, Hatz Activate stands apart: a rollout console built for the managed service providers who resell the platform.

◆ Where it's heading

Two arcs run in parallel. The phone agent is being hardened into a product an MSP can deploy repeatedly across client sites — duplicate it onto a new number, reassign it to a different tenant, cap its minutes — while Activate supplies the partner with the shadow-AI scan and enablement material that starts the sales conversation. Model additions continue but carry no direction; they are table stakes restated every few weeks.

◆ Prediction

Expect more tenant- and partner-scoped administration, since renaming tenants and invoicing over the API both landed this window and point at MSPs managing many clients programmatically. The phone agent's usage-based pricing suggests metering and limits will keep expanding ahead of any new end-user capability.

X
Xurrent
SUPPORT
6.3

Sera AI crosses from assistant to autonomous agent while the ITSM core keeps its monthly grind.

◆ Current state

Xurrent ships on a disciplined monthly cadence, and the last quarter splits cleanly in two. One half is steady ITSM plumbing — shared tags across Requests, Problems, Workflows and Projects, CMDB reconciliation that a human can actually read, iPaaS connectors, self-service reservations. The other half is Sera AI, which moved from a chat widget to a configurable studio and then, on 10 July, to two agents that act without a person in the loop.

◆ Where it's heading

The two tracks are converging rather than running in parallel. Knowledge article readiness, CI location hints and reconciliation legibility are not standalone features — they are the data-quality preconditions an agent needs before it can be trusted to close a request. Xurrent is building the substrate first and letting Sera consume it, which is why the agent work has landed without the usual rollback noise. Agent Designer success metrics suggest the next constraint is proving the agents work, not shipping more of them.

◆ Prediction

Expect the agent count to grow slowly and the governance surface around it to grow faster — more Golden Set tooling, more per-agent success reporting, and tighter scoping of which request types an agent may close unaided.

Alternatives to Hatz AI and Xurrent

Other Support products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Hatz AI or Xurrent.

See all Hatz AI alternatives → · See all Xurrent alternatives →

Recent activity from Hatz AI and Xurrent

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 5d agoHatz AIAttachment-Only Messages, Tenant Renaming, Invoices Over the API, Phone Agent Drafts and Silence Controls
  2. 12d agoHatz AIDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, Self-Reporting Credit Usage, Phone Agent Pause/Reassign/Duplicate, Artifact Presentation Mode, Auto-Tool Selection Notice
  3. 13d agoXurrentKnowledge auto-translation and tag merging land in August
  4. 14d agoHatz AIHatz Activate: a Shadow AI scan and an MSP rollout console
  5. 16d agoXurrentQ3 2026 IMR updates open as a living document
  6. 19d agoHatz AIAutoTool v2, Optimized Phone Agent Pricing, MSP Workshop Categories for Agents
  7. 20d agoHatz AIKimi K3, GLM 5.2 Fast
  8. 25d agoHatz AIClaude Opus 5
  9. 27d agoXurrentMy Reservations self-service and Agent Designer success metrics
  10. 1mo agoXurrentShared tags span Requests, Problems, Workflows and Projects
  11. 1mo agoXurrentSera AI's first two autonomous agents ship
  12. 1mo agoXurrentGetting Started with Sera AI Studio

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Hatz AI and Xurrent?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Hatz AI and Xurrent are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Hatz AI better than Xurrent?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Hatz AI and Xurrent are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Support products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Hatz AI?

Top Hatz AI alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Hatz AI alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/hatz-ai for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Xurrent?

Top Xurrent alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Xurrent alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/xurrent for the full list with editorial commentary on each.